Glenwood Springs Council blocks Glenwood Meadows proposal and kills development

A proposal to build 300 units in Glenwood Meadows died last week after a 3-3 draw from Glenwood Springs City Council.

Located on a plot of land annexed by the city around 20 years ago, the development proposal comprised 14 buildings on around 30 hectares of land with around 3 hectares of parkland for use by the tenants as well as public access to the Wulfsohn-Weg system.

Trent Hyatt, the city’s chief planner, told council members at the meeting on Thursday that applicants, the BLD Group and Glenwood Meadows LLC, are volunteering to deed 15 of the 300 units for up to five years and at a rate of 100% to have. of the median land income in this period. Because the development approval process began before the council implemented a requirement for affordable housing for new developments earlier this year, Hyatt said developers are not required to restrict units with deeds.

During the meetings with the planning and zoning committee, the developers volunteered to rent 10 units at 100% AMI. While the commission approved the proposal 6-0, the commissioners asked the BLD Group to consider increasing the number of deed-restricted units. The developer responded by volunteering five more units.

Representing the applicants, attorney Chad Lee said the developers carefully designed the units to meet city regulations without deviations.

“We are proud to introduce this project that has been in the works for 20 years,” said Lee.

In addition to the residential units, the draft proposal included a roughly 21,000-square-foot clubhouse that could be about 5,000-square-foot for day care for up to 70 children, he said.

Around 52% of the residential units were designed as two- and three-room apartments, the remaining units consist of one-room and studio apartments. Lee said these units could be rented at prices ranging from around $ 1,500 per month for a low-end studio and up to $ 2,800 for a three-bedroom apartment.

Mayor Pro Tem Charlie Willman asked if applicants expected police officers, firefighters and teachers – people Lee had previously identified as potential benefactors of the development – to afford these rents.

“Yeah, I think they could,” said Lee. “These are apartments in line with the market and rented out at market prices. The rents will only go up. “

Lee said the development had received no public feedback – good or bad – prior to the meeting, and no one spoke out for or against the proposal during the council meeting’s public comment.

A resident has spoken out to urge the council that future developers enroll in mandatory composting and recycling programs.

Councilor Tony Hershey, who spoke out against the 480 Donegan development, said he supported the BLD group’s proposal.

“This is different, this is classic infill,” said Hershey. “I’m not surprised that there is no public outrage here.”

The 480 Donegan development proposal started with several apartment complexes similar to the design layout proposed for Glenwood Meadows, but Donegan developers R2 Partners later responded to public feedback by putting in a mix of townhouses and the number of two and three -Room apartments elevated. The proposed 480 Donegan development Plans include 300 residential units on approximately 16 acres.

Willman, who initially opposed the 480 Donegan development but later supported it after the changes made by the developer, said he was disappointed with the lack of living diversity in the Glenwood Meadows proposal.

“This project consists of 13 homogeneous boxes,” said Willman. “I don’t think we need that in this church.”

Willman said residents would be better served by developing different types of housing, including townhouses, single-family homes and apartments. He also expressed concern about the lack of affordable options within the proposed development.

Councilor Paula Stepp, who spoke out against the 480 Donegan development, shared Willman’s concern about the lack of living diversity and said she was also concerned about the traffic impact of high-density development with limited exit points.

Lee responded to Stepp’s comments by pointing out that the area is zoned for high-density housing and the traffic routing of the development was in line with city regulations.

The potential for a daycare center caught the attention of Councilor Ingrid Wussow, who opposed the 480 Donegan project.

“To my own regret, I probably support that,” said Wussow. “Because I prefer that you meet today’s affordable housing requirements.”

Councilor Shelley Kaup, who supported the 480 Donegan Development, said she would support the development as there is growing evidence that housing shortages are at the root of labor challenges in the area.

“I am fascinated that there have been no public comments,” said Kaup. “However, I would like to see the 15-unit charter be limited to more than five years.”

Mayor Jonathan Godes, who supported the 480 Donegan development, said the tiered landscaping was a formidable approach to developing the sloped site and agreed with Wussow that the daycare would be an attractive addition, but said the lack of living diversity was an issue for him may be.

“I’m very torn,” he said.

Instead of what has been proposed, Godes said he would rather see a phased development proposal for all 415 housing units allowed to be built within the area according to the city code, including 300 apartments and 115 townhouses or single-family homes.

Councilor Steve Davis was absent.

The development proposal of the BLD Group was rejected in the event of a tie, with Godes, Willman and Stepp voting against the proposal and Hershey, Wussow and Kaup voting in favor.

Reporter Ike Fredregill can be reached at 970-384-9154 or by email at [email protected].

Source link

About Yadira Wilkes

Check Also

The city is targeting the property on Monegan Road for a potential affordable housing project

The City of Whitefish is taking the first steps to prepare part of its own …